Munoz

Munoz v. City of Los Angeles CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 2024B321795California6,519 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/16/24 Munoz v. City of Los Angeles CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

ALFONSO MUNOZ, B321795

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 18STCV01290)

CITY OF LOS ANGELES,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jon R. Takasugi, Judge. Affirmed. The Law Offices of John A. Schlaff and John A. Schlaff for Plaintiff and Appellant. Hydee Feldstein Soto, City Attorney, Denise C. Mills, Chief Deputy City Attorney, Scott Marcus, Chief Assistant City Attorney, Shaun Dabby Jacobs, Supervising Assistant City Attorney, and Timothy Martin, Deputy City Attorney for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.