In re E.J. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 2024C100760California2,939 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 10/16/24 In re E.J. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

In re E.J., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court C100760 Law.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES (Super. Ct. No. AGENCY, STKJDDP20230000435)

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

S.M.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant S.M., biological father of minor E.J., appeals from the juvenile court’s judgment at disposition adjudging the minor a dependent and removing him from parental custody. (Welf. & Inst. Code,1 §§ 361, 395.) He contends the requirement that he participate in substance abuse services and testing as part of his reunification case plan was an abuse of discretion. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.