In Re: Conwell Ponath v. Jill Ford
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 17, 202423-15833California544 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
OCT 17 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: CONWELL O. PONATH; CHERYL No. 23-15833
J. PONATH,
D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01523-DLR Debtors. ______________________________
MEMORANDUM*
CONWELL O. PONATH; CHERYL J.
PONATH,
Appellants,
v.
JILL H. FORD,
Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 3, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Conwell and Cheryl Ponath, two Chapter 7 debtors, appeal the district court’s
affirmance of a bankruptcy-court order limiting their homestead exemption to the
value of their home equity at the time of filing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
U.S.C. § 158(d)(1), and review determinations regarding the scope of…