Arrington

United States v. Arrington

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 17, 202423-1860California447 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1860 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:10-cr-00023-SOM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARCUS XAVIER ARRINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Susan O. Mollway, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 7, 2024** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and GRABER and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Marcus Xavier Arrington appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the sixty-month term of supervised release imposed upon his third

revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and we affirm.

Arrington pleaded guilty to one count of Sex Trafficking of a Minor, in

violation of 18 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.