Kar
Kar v. Patel
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202423-3578California514 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TANMAY KAR; PROFITPAY No. 23-3578 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., D.C. No. 4:23-cv-02064-YGR Plaintiffs - Appellants,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
VIMAL PATEL; DEVESH
PATEL; ALINOR HOLDINGS, INC.,
doing business as Onriva; JAYESH
PATEL; VAJID JAFRI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 16, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: OWENS, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Appellants Tanmay Kar and ProfitPay Technologies, Inc. appeal from the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s judgment dismissing their securities fraud action for failure to state
a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…