Kar

Kar v. Patel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 18, 202423-3578California514 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TANMAY KAR; PROFITPAY No. 23-3578 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., D.C. No. 4:23-cv-02064-YGR Plaintiffs - Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

VIMAL PATEL; DEVESH

PATEL; ALINOR HOLDINGS, INC.,

doing business as Onriva; JAYESH

PATEL; VAJID JAFRI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 16, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Appellants Tanmay Kar and ProfitPay Technologies, Inc. appeal from the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s judgment dismissing their securities fraud action for failure to state

a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.