Roy

Roy v. Roy CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 2024A166932California5,745 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 10/18/24 Roy v. Roy CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

NEVENA ROY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A166932

v. JOYANTO ROY, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 17-FAM-03270) Defendant and Appellant.

Joyanto Roy (Father) appeals from a December 2022 custody and visitation order that was designated by the family court as permanent and final. Father argues that the family court erred when it issued temporary custody and visitation orders the year before, in December 2021, allowing Nevena Roy (Mother) to move from San Mateo County to San Diego with their daughter N.R. (Minor) who was then four years old, and granting Mother sole physical custody of Minor.1 He also argues that the family court abused its discretion when it issued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.