People v. Dunsmore CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Delgadillo brief and asks the court to independently review the record for error. To assist the court and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel has identified three possible issues that were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: 1. Whether the court should order resentencing in the interests of justice. 2. Whether a conviction for attempted manslaughter is eligible for relief under section 1172.6. 3. Whether custody credits were properly applied. We have exercised our discretion to independently review the record for error. Our review of the record has not identified any potentially meritorious issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Dunsmore in this appeal.

3

DISPOSITION

The order denying Dunsmore’s second petition for resentencing under section 1172.6 is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

DO, J.

CASTILLO, J.

4