P.
P. v. Hernandez CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Rubin, J.
DISCUSSION
We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders, and considered the issues identified by Hernandez and his counsel. The abstract of judgment states that the 10-year firearm enhancement on count 2 was imposed under section 12022.53, subdivision (d), instead of subdivision (b) as ordered by the trial court. Otherwise, we find no arguable issue that would result in a reversal or modification of the conviction. Regarding the issues raised by Hernandez, his claims of jury racial bias and intoxication are not supported by the record. Hernandez also admitted at trial that he saw two individuals and fired in their direction, contradicting his alleged lack of awareness of Clark’s presence.!(6 RT 2060-2061)! As for Hernandez’s challenge to his sentence, there is no indication the trial court misapplied sentencing laws or abused its discretion. Finally, Hernandez’s claims of inadequate representation and the jury being misled are conclusory and find no support in the record.
3 Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment with directions to correct the abstract of judgment. Competent counsel has represented Hernandez on this appeal.