Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of California
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202420-17316California1,092 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BENJAMIN KOHN, No. 20-17316
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-04827-PJH
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA;
CALIFORNIA COMMITTEE OF BAR
EXAMINERS, and Their Agents in Their Official Capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 15, 2024 ** San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
In Kohn v. State Bar of California, 87 F.4th 1021 (9th Cir. 2023), our court
sitting en banc reaffirmed our precedent holding that the State Bar of California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). enjoys Eleventh Amendment immunity. We must now address whether the…