Woody

Woody v. Coinbase Global, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202423-3584California681 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DALLAS WOODY; PETER No. 23-3584 HREHOROVICH, individually and on D.C. No. behalf of all others similarly situated, 3:23-cv-00190-JD Plaintiffs - Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

COINBASE GLOBAL, INC.; COINBASE,

INC.; BRIAN ARMSTRONG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Dallas Woody and Peter Hrehorovich (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s

order compelling arbitration of their claims against Coinbase Global, Inc., Coinbase,

Inc., and Brian Armstrong (together, “Coinbase”). Though Coinbase did not file a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. cross-appeal, it now challenges the district court’s denial of its request for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.