Sonia Garcia v. Geico Casualty Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202423-55646California808 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SONIA MENA GARCIA, an individual; No. 23-55646 JUAN VALENCIA, an individual, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:22-cv-06041-PA-JEM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 9, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: NGUYEN and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,** District Judge.

The issue in this diversity action is whether the district court erred in granting

summary judgment against Sonia Mena Garcia and Juan Valencia (“Plaintiffs”),

who had been assigned any rights that Luis Herrera, the named insured under an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. automobile insurance policy issued by GEICO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.