Mejia

United States v. Mejia

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 202424-664California581 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 21 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-664 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-10125-RBM-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

JOSE LUIS MEJIA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Ruth Bermudez Montenegro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 11, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Mejia appeals his sentence for violating a condition of supervised

release. The district court held a single sentencing hearing during which it

sentenced Mejia to 18 months for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1324, plus a consecutive

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ten-month term for violating a condition of his supervised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.