Lerner & Rowe Pc v. Brown Engstrand & Shely LLC

Good Law
119 F.4th 711
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 202423-16060California7,424 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Appellant Lerner & Rowe, PC (“Lerner & Rowe”), and Appellee Brown, Engstrand & Shely, LLC—which does business as The Accident Law Group (“ALG”)—are both personal injury law firms based in Arizona. Founded in 2005, Lerner & Rowe is the larger of the two firms with nineteen offices throughout the state. It has three registered trademarks: on June 14, 2011, it registered the phrase “Lerner & Rowe Gives Back;” on March 3, 2015, it registered the name “Glen Lerner;” and, on May 19, 2020, it registered the name “Lerner & Rowe.” Lerner & Rowe has spent over $100 million promoting its brand and trademarks in Arizona. Since its founding in 2015 until 2021, ALG purchased the term “Lerner & Rowe” as a Google Ads keyword, which prompted ALG’s advertisements to appear near the top of Google’s search results list whenever someone searched for “Lerner & Rowe.” This strategy, known as “conquesting,” is a common internet marketing tool by which companies

LERNER & ROWE PC V. BROWN ENGSTRAND & SHELY LLC

promote their services to potential customers who might be searching for a competitor. In fact, Lerner & Rowe has engaged in conquesting in other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.