Pacheco
Pacheco v. Universal Protection Services CA2/5
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 10/21/24 Pacheco v. Universal Protection Services CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
IRVING PACHECO, B331762
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 22STCV11856)
UNIVERSAL PROTECTION
SERVICES, L.P.,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jill Feeney, Judge. Affirmed. King & Siegel and Robert J. King for Plaintiff and Appellant. Martenson, Hasbrouck & Simon, David L. Lewis and Danielle J. Kaufman for Defendant and Respondent. Appellant Irving Pacheco appeals from an order denying his special motion to strike allegations from the cross-complaint…