Pacheco

Pacheco v. Universal Protection Services CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2024B331762California1,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/21/24 Pacheco v. Universal Protection Services CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

IRVING PACHECO, B331762

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 22STCV11856)

UNIVERSAL PROTECTION

SERVICES, L.P.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jill Feeney, Judge. Affirmed. King & Siegel and Robert J. King for Plaintiff and Appellant. Martenson, Hasbrouck & Simon, David L. Lewis and Danielle J. Kaufman for Defendant and Respondent. Appellant Irving Pacheco appeals from an order denying his special motion to strike allegations from the cross-complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.