Noyes

Noyes v. Davis CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 22, 2024A167787California3,513 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 10/22/24 Noyes v. Davis CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

HENRY S. NOYES,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A167787

v. STANLEY D. DAVIS, et al., (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCV-267919) Defendants and Appellants.

More than 100 years ago, neighboring landowners in Healdsburg created an express easement for right of way that ran with the land and that allowed the benefitted neighbors to travel over and across the property of the burdened neighbors to reach a county road. In this quiet title and declaratory relief action, plaintiff Henry S. Noyes, who owns property that was once part of the benefitted neighbors’ land, asserts this express easement for right of way is appurtenant to and benefits his property. The trial court granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.