Wendy Cunning v. Skye Bioscience, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 202423-55248California3,249 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WENDY CUNNING, No. 23-55248
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 8:21-CV-00710-DOC-
KES
v.
SKYE BIOSCIENCE, INC., MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 12, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: BYBEE, BEA, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BYBEE.
Defendant-Appellant Skye Bioscience, Inc. (Skye) appeals the district court’s
order that denied its renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and its motion
for a new trial on Plaintiff-Appellant Wendy Cunning’s claims for retaliatory
termination under the Sarbanes Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A (SOX), and the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. California Whistleblower Protection Act, Cal. Labor…