Oregon Valdez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 202423-1730California931 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LORENA OREGON VALDEZ; YESSICA No. 23-1730 JAQUELIN TORRES Agency Nos.

OREGON; CONCEPCION TORRES A213-086-908

OREGON, A213-086-909

A213-086-910

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 10, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Lorena Oregon Valdez and her minor daughters, Jaquelin Torres Oregon and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Concepcion Torres Oregon, natives of Mexico, petition for review of a decision by

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.