Mendoza Gloria v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 22, 202423-3343California1,004 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 22 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JASON ARTURO MENDOZA GLORIA, No. 23-3343 Agency No. Petitioner, A207-596-310 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration Court

Submitted October 10, 2024** Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: BEA, BENNETT, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Jason Arturo Mendoza Gloria, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of an order of an immigration judge affirming an asylum officer’s

determination that he lacks a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in Mexico.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). That determination came after a reasonable fear screening interview. See generally

Alvarado-Herrera v. Garland, 993 F.3d 1187, 1195 (9th Cir. 2021). We have

jurisdiction under 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.