Ernest Calhoon v. Richard Thierolf, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 202421-35950California611 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNEST R. CALHOON, No. 21-35950

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00884-MC

v.

MEMORANDUM *

RICHARD B. THIEROLF, Jr.; JACOBSON,

THIEROLF AND DICKEY P.C.; DOES, 1-

100,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 16, 2024**

Before: SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Ernest R. Calhoon appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his diversity action alleging various federal and state law claims

connected to the estates of his mother and maternal grandparents and the maternal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). grandparents’ guardianship proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.