Ernest Calhoon v. Richard Thierolf, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 202421-35950California611 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERNEST R. CALHOON, No. 21-35950
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00884-MC
v.
MEMORANDUM *
RICHARD B. THIEROLF, Jr.; JACOBSON,
THIEROLF AND DICKEY P.C.; DOES, 1-
100,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 16, 2024**
Before: SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Ernest R. Calhoon appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his diversity action alleging various federal and state law claims
connected to the estates of his mother and maternal grandparents and the maternal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). grandparents’ guardianship proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.