Eric Bright v. Treehouse Group, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 202423-15652California275 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC WARREN BRIGHT; DARLENA No. 23-15652

BRIGHT,

D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00839-JJT Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

TREEHOUSE GROUP, LLC; BREIT-

BRIGHTHAVEN MHC, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 16, 2024**

Before: SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Eric Warren Bright and Darlena Bright appeal pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging claims related to their eviction.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Lake v. Ohana…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.