Cheryl Young v. Elaine Chao

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 202423-15219California801 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHERYL YOUNG, No. 23-15219

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:19-cv-01411-JCS

PETE BUTTIGIEG,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 23, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Cheryl Young appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

favor of Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg in her action alleging

constructive discharge based on age and race in violation of Title VII of the Civil

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) and the Age Discrimination in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.