Juan-Diego

United States v. Juan-Diego

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 202423-1276California648 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OCT 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1276

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:22-cr-01619-RM-BGM-1 v.

MATEO JUAN-DIEGO, AKA Mateo MEMORANDUM* Diego,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 12, 2024 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: RAWLINSON and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,** District Judge.

Mateo Juan-Diego (“Juan-Diego”) appeals his conviction for illegal reentry of

a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), as enhanced by § 1326(b)(1). He

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. maintains that his guilty plea was involuntary because the magistrate judge failed to

mention the “knowledge” element of the offense when taking his plea. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.