Romero Hernandez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 202423-2669California768 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUCIA DEL CARMEN ROMERO No. 23-2669 HERNANDEZ; SAUL ELISEO RIVAS Agency Nos.

ROMERO, A216-566-166

A216-566-167

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 21, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Lucia Del Carmon Romero Hernandez (“Petitioner”), and her minor son Saul

Eliseo Rivas Romero (together “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of El Salvador,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of their appeal

of the Immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.