People v. Vargas CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Delgadillo brief that does not identify any potentially meritorious issues for reversal on appeal. To comply with the mandates of Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel does identify one possible issue which was considered in

2 evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Whether the trial court erred in failing to find Vargas had established a prima facie case for relief. We have independently reviewed the record for error. Our review has not disclosed any potentially meritorious issue for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Vargas on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order denying Vargas’s petition for resentencing under section 1172.6 is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

IRION, J.

BUCHANAN, J.

3