Ramirez Muniz v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 202423-965California311 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SOLEDAD ONEYDA RAMIREZ MUNIZ, No. 23-965 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-679-616 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 16, 2024 **

Before: SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Soledad Oneyda Ramirez Muniz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing

her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

substantial evidence the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.