Lane

United States v. Lane

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 202423-1919California1,210 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1919 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:18-cr-08295-GMS-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

BO LANE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 22, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Bo Lane appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Lane was convicted of seven counts of aggravated sexual abuse of a child in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c). A few weeks before trial, the government

disclosed evidence of two hairs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.