Jones

United States v. Jones

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 202424-969California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-969 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:05-cr-00806-JSW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALIJANDRO JONES, AKA Alejandro Jones, AKA Quincy Jones, AKA Lucifer,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 16, 2024**

Before: SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Alijandro Jones appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 60-month sentence imposed upon the revocation of supervised release. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jones contends that the district court was unfairly predisposed to revoke his

supervised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.