Stephanie Stephens v. State of Arizona
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 202423-16019California1,614 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEPHANIE STEPHENS, individual, No. 23-16019
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01605-DJH
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STATE OF ARIZONA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 22, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Stephanie Stephens appeals the district court’s order dismissing her
U.S.C. § 1983 claim for violation of the constitutional right to familial association
through judicial deception. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because the district court erred in finding that Stephens failed to state a judicial
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deception claim and…