Siguenza Garay v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 202422-881California470 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE SIGUENZA GARAY, No. 22-881 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-901-159 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted **

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Siguenza Garay, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order affirming without

opinion an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the Board’s

legal conclusions de novo and the Boards’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.