Rodas De Osegueda v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 202423-794California1,613 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

INES RODAS DE OSEGUEDA; JOSE No. 23-794 ADRIAN OSEGUEDA-RODAS, Agency Nos.

A209-893-748

Petitioners, A209-893-749 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 8, 2024** Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioners Ines Rodas de Osegueda and her son, Jose Adrian Osegueda

Rodas, are natives of El Salvador. 1 They petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) final order of removal, in which the BIA affirmed the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying the Petitioners’ applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.