Lawrence

Lawrence v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 202423-3557California311 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADE ADEMOLA LAWRENCE, No. 23-3557 Agency No. Petitioner, A099-286-803 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 16, 2024**

Before: SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Ade Ademola Lawrence, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision finding him removable. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, including whether a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). conviction is an aggravated felony. Valdez v. Garland, 28 F.4th 72, 76-77 (9th Cir.

2022). We deny…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.