Hui Xu v. Lightsmyth Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 202423-35423California1,838 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUI XU, an individual, No. 23-35423

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-01201-MC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LIGHTSMYTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation; FINISAR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 20, 2024 Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and EZRA,** District Judge.

Hui Xu appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to her

employer LightSmyth Technologies, Inc., and its parent company Finisar Corp., on

Xu’s claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. Disabilities Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.