Scheper

Scheper v. Sullivan CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2024D083292California2,045 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/24/24 Scheper v. Sullivan CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SCOTT SCHEPER, D083292

Cross-defendant and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 37-2020- 00020204-CU-FR-CTL, BRIAN SULLIVAN, 37-2020-00030343-CU-OR-NC)

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Richard S. Whitney, Judge. Reversed. Ronald H. Freshman for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. Stratege Law, Robert M. Traylor and J. Scott Scheper for Cross- defendant and Respondent. In June 2020, Michael Lockerman, represented by attorney J. Scott Scheper, sued Brian Sullivan and others alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.