People v. Caceres CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2024B332585California749 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/25/24 P. v. Caceres CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE, B332585

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA070847) v.

JAIME CACERES,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ronald S. Coen, Judge. Affirmed. Jaime Caceres, in propria persona; and Stanley Dale Radtke, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Jaime Caceres appeals from an order denying his petition for resentencing under Penal Code1 section 1170.03, which the trial court treated as a petition for resentencing under section 1170, subdivision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.