Torres-Medina
Torres-Medina v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202423-311California356 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
OCT 28 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CELIA TORRES-MEDINA, No. 23-311
Petitioner, Agency No.
A200-975-675
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 24, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Celia Torres-Medina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to
reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) and (b)(6), and we deny
the petition for review.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review “the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of
discretion.” Hernandez-Ortiz v. Garland, 32 F.4th 794, 800 (9th Cir.…