Torres-Medina

Torres-Medina v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202423-311California356 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OCT 28 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CELIA TORRES-MEDINA, No. 23-311

Petitioner, Agency No.

A200-975-675

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 24, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Celia Torres-Medina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to

reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) and (b)(6), and we deny

the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review “the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of

discretion.” Hernandez-Ortiz v. Garland, 32 F.4th 794, 800 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.