Ruiz Arias v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202423-2640California727 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERICKA LISSETTE RUIZ ARIAS, No. 23-2640 Agency No. A208-977-641 Petitioner,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 24, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: LEE, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Ericka Lissette Ruiz Arias (“Ruiz Arias”) seeks review of a Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming a decision by an Immigration

Judge (“IJ”) denying Petitioner’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) relief. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

When reviewing final orders of the BIA, we apply the highly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.