Raymond Armstrong v. Martin O'Malley
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202423-35515California335 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAYMOND D. ARMSTRONG, No. 23-35515
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05387-TLF
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Theresa Lauren Fricke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 23, 2024** Portland, Oregon
Before: LEE, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Raymond Dean Armstrong appeals the district court’s order affirming the
denial of his application for Social Security benefits. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “We review de novo a district court’s order affirming a denial of Social