Raymond Armstrong v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202423-35515California335 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND D. ARMSTRONG, No. 23-35515

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05387-TLF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Theresa Lauren Fricke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 23, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: LEE, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Dean Armstrong appeals the district court’s order affirming the

denial of his application for Social Security benefits. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “We review de novo a district court’s order affirming a denial of Social

Security benefits.” Revels v. Berryhill, 874 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.