James Menefield v. J. Anderson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202423-55148California798 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES WILBURN MENEFIELD, No. 23-55148

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:21-cv-04910-VAP-PLA

J. ANDERSON, Supervising Correctional

Cook, individual and official capacity, M. MEMORANDUM* DELEON, Correctional Supervising Cook, individual and official capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 28, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

James Menefield, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from

the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees in his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.