Handojo
Handojo v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202423-823California654 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
INDRAJANTI HANDOJO, No. 23-823 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-482-443 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 10, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Indrajanti Handojo, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of
a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal
from an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a) and deny the petition.