Castillo Martinez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202423-3030California722 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICARDO CASTILLO MARTINEZ, No. 23-3030 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-145-218 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 24, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: LEE, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Ricardo Castillo Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of an

order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying his applications for cancellation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal and voluntary departure. Because we lack jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), we dismiss the petition.

Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) strips courts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.