Smith v. Ust - United States Trustee, Phoenix

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202424-174California847 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIM D. SMITH, No. 24-174 BAP. No. Appellant, 23-1050 v. MEMORANDUM*

UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,

PHOENIX,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Lafferty, Corbit, and Faris, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted October 24, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Jim D. Smith appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate

Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order regarding attorney’s fees. We

review decisions of the BAP de novo. Renwick v. Bennett (In re Bennett), 298

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 1059, 1063 (9th Cir. 2002). We will not disturb the bankruptcy court’s award

of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.