Smith v. Ust - United States Trustee, Phoenix
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202424-174California847 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JIM D. SMITH, No. 24-174 BAP. No. Appellant, 23-1050 v. MEMORANDUM*
UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,
PHOENIX,
Appellee.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Lafferty, Corbit, and Faris, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted October 24, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Jim D. Smith appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate
Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order regarding attorney’s fees. We
review decisions of the BAP de novo. Renwick v. Bennett (In re Bennett), 298
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 1059, 1063 (9th Cir. 2002). We will not disturb the bankruptcy court’s award
of…