Smith v. Ust - United States Trustee, Phoenix

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 202424-173California1,059 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIM D. SMITH, Attorney, No. 24-173 BAP No. Appellant, 23-1049 v. MEMORANDUM*

UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE,

PHOENIX,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Lafferty, Corbit, and Faris, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted October 24, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Jim D. Smith appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate

Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting relief under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) from its prior order awarding Smith attorney’s fees

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and reducing the award of attorney’s fees. We review decisions of the BAP de

novo.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.