Luxury Lease Company v. Maldonado CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2024B324154California2,671 words

Opinion

Opinion

Viramontes, J.

Filed 10/28/24 Luxury Lease Company v. Maldonado CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

LUXURY LEASE COMPANY, B324154

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCV21812) v.

JORGE MALDONADO,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Randolph M. Hammock, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Gary Kurtz and Gary Kurtz for Defendant and Appellant. Herzlich, Blum & Roza and Marta Roza for Plaintiff and Respondent. _________________________________ Defendant and appellant Jorge Maldonado appeals from a judgment after the trial court denied his motion to set aside a default and vacate a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent Luxury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.