Federighi

I. DISCUSSION

Orders and judgments are presumed to be correct, and the appellant must affirmatively show error. (Denham v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564.) “To demonstrate error, appellant must present meaningful legal analysis supported by citations to authority and citations to facts in the record that support the claim of error. [Citations.] When a point is asserted without argument and authority for the proposition, ‘it is deemed to be without foundation and requires no discussion by the reviewing court.’ [Citations.] Hence, conclusory claims of error will fail.” (In re S.C. (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 396, 408.) The appellant must provide an adequate record to demonstrate error. (Ballard v. Uribe (1986) 41 Cal.3d 564, 574; Foust v. San Jose Construction Co., Inc. (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 181, 187.) Merely furnishing the record is not enough. The appellant must “[s]upport any reference to a matter in the record by a citation to the volume and page number of the record where the matter appears.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(C).) When the appellant fails to do so, we may disregard the unsupported factual assertions. (Tanguilig v. Valdez (2019) 36 Cal.App.5th 514,…