Entrepreneur Media v. Smith CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2024C095545California3,911 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/28/24 Entrepreneur Media v. Smith CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC., C095545

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2021-00295096-CU-PAG-DS) v.

SCOTT SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

Motions to strike strategic lawsuits against public participation (anti-SLAPP) cover claims based on statements made “in connection with a public issue.” (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 425.16, subds. (b)(1), (e).) Plaintiff Entrepreneur Media, Inc. sued defendant Scott Smith2 for defamation and other claims based on statements defendant made

Undesignated section references are to the Code of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff also sued a corporate entity defendant owns. The trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.