Baker Entertainment v. Emmett Furla Oasis Films CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2024B323388California2,301 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/28/24 Baker Entertainment v. Emmett Furla Oasis Films CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

BAKER ENTERTAINMENT, LLC B323388

et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. SC127979)

v.

EMMETT FURLA OASIS FILMS,

LLC et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Craig D. Karlan, Judge. Dismissed as moot. Hamrick & Evans, Martin J. Barab, A. Raymond Hamrick, III, and Kenneth A. Kotarski for Defendants and Appellants. No appearance for Plaintiffs and Respondents. _______________________ George Furla, Emmett Furla Oasis Films, LLC (EFO), Georgia Film Fund Twenty-Nine, LLC and Higrowth (Inconceivable), LLC appeal from an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.