United States v. Younes Nasri
119 F.4th 1172
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 202422-55685California25,906 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-55685
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01134- v. WQH-BLM
YOUNES NASRI,
OPINION
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
$1,152,366.18 IN FUNDS FROM
BENDURA BANK AG, PORTFOLIO
NUMBER XX5.280, Held in The Name of Golden Castle Technology Limited; $53,020.18 IN FUNDS
FROM BENDURA BANK AG,
PORTFOLIO NUMBER XX3.200,
Held in The Name of Younes Nasri,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 4, 2023 * Pasadena, California
Filed October 29, 2024
Before: Jay S. Bybee, Mark J. Bennett, and Roopali H. Desai, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Desai; Concurrence by Judge Bybee; Concurrence by Judge Desai; Dissent by Judge Bennett
SUMMARY **
Civil Forfeiture / In Rem Jurisdiction
In a civil forfeiture action brought by the United States to recover ill-gotten gains from fugitive Younes Nasri, the panel held that the district court’s exercise of in rem jurisdiction violated due process and…