Daniel Ratliff v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 202423-35599California1,103 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL J. RATLIFF, No. 23-35599

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05358-TLF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Theresa Lauren Fricke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: LEE, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Daniel J. Ratliff appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner

of the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for disability

insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The administrative law

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judge (“ALJ”) determined that Ratliff was not disabled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.