Daniel Ratliff v. Martin O'Malley
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 202423-35599California1,103 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL J. RATLIFF, No. 23-35599
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-05358-TLF
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Theresa Lauren Fricke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2024** Portland, Oregon
Before: LEE, VANDYKE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Daniel J. Ratliff appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner
of the Social Security Administration’s denial of his application for disability
insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The administrative law
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judge (“ALJ”) determined that Ratliff was not disabled…