Muha
Muha v. Experian Information Solutions
Opinion
Opinion
Delaney, J.
Filed 10/1/24; certified for publication 10/29/24 (order attached)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
CHARLOTTE MUHA et al.,
Plaintiffs and Appellants, G062621
v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 30-2021- 01233648; 30-2021-01233482)
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., OPINION
Defendant and Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, William D. Claster, Judge. Affirmed. Ademi, John D. Blythin, and Monteverde & Associates, and David E. Bower, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Jones Day, John A. Vogt, Ryan D. Ball, David A. Phillips, Nathaniel P. Garrett, for Defendant and Respondent. Charlotte Muha, Chaning, Graber, and Debra Graber (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the superior court granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings brought by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”). The superior court granted Experian’s motion based on Limon v. Circle K Stores Inc. (2022) 84 Cal.App.5th 671 (Limon), which generally held that a…