Muha

Muha v. Experian Information Solutions

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2024G062621California3,205 words

Opinion

Opinion

Delaney, J.

Filed 10/1/24; certified for publication 10/29/24 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CHARLOTTE MUHA et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, G062621

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 30-2021- 01233648; 30-2021-01233482)

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS, INC., OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, William D. Claster, Judge. Affirmed. Ademi, John D. Blythin, and Monteverde & Associates, and David E. Bower, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Jones Day, John A. Vogt, Ryan D. Ball, David A. Phillips, Nathaniel P. Garrett, for Defendant and Respondent. Charlotte Muha, Chaning, Graber, and Debra Graber (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the superior court granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings brought by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”). The superior court granted Experian’s motion based on Limon v. Circle K Stores Inc. (2022) 84 Cal.App.5th 671 (Limon), which generally held that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.