Sandusky

United States v. Sandusky

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 29, 202423-2926California616 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2024

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2926 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00548-PA-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

AARON SANDUSKY,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 13, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: COLLINS, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Aaron Sandusky appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for early

termination of supervised release under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, see United

States v. Ponce, 22 F.4th 1045, 1046 (9th Cir. 2022), and we affirm.

The district court did not apply an incorrect legal standard in evaluating

Sandusky’s motion. Under the applicable statute, the district court may terminate a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.